Мы тестируем новую версию сайта. Эта версия обновляться не будет. Приносим извинения за временные неудобства.
We are testing a new version of the site. This version will not be updated. We apologise for any temporary inconvenience.
Estamos probando una nueva versión del sitio. Esta versión no se actualizará. Rogamos disculpen las molestias.

Site statistics

35225 facts from 177 countries related to 1198 phenomena have been registered in Archive. 2834 of them were solved, another 11033 are under verification for compliance with one of the 322 versions.

0 facts have been added for last 24 hours.

Share your story

You are in "Archive" section

This section contains descriptions of unexplained facts provided by eyewitnesses or published in the media, as well as the results of their analysis by the group.

UFO. United States

ID #1717406180
Added Mon, 03/06/2024
Author July N.
Sources
Phenomena
Status
Result
Resume

Initial data

Initial information from sources or from an eyewitness
Incident date: 
05.06.2005
Location: 
Феникс, AZ
United States

Phoenix, Arizona, June 5, 2005

The following statement of submission has been provided by/NAWFAL93:

I came across this video. The quality is low, but it looks interesting. I can't find any more information about this. Has anyone seen this before? Do you think it's fake?

Original news

Pheonix Arizona , June 5th 2005.

The following submission statement was provided by u/NAWFAL93:

I came across this video. The quality is low, but it looks interesting. I can't find more information about it. Has anyone seen it before? Do you think it is fake?

____________________

[DEBUNKED] Koi UFO Video 087 appears to show a ring of lights in the night sky above some trees, with lights appearing to fly in and out the ring formation. The video has a caption indicating it was filmed in Phoenix (Arizona) on 5th June 2005.

The video was posted in 2005 and gained considerable publicity, including via the rense.com website.  The publicity prompted supportive comments from various ufologists and video editing experts, including David Sereda (famous for his analysis of NASA "UFO" videos).

In fact, Brian Bessent confessed in 2006 that he had hoaxed the video.  He posted a diatribe on his ufotheatre.com website about the gullibility of the UFO community. He explained that he hoaxed UFO videos to make money and that this was very easy to do.  He referred, in particular, to his use of the "Bryce" animation software plus "stoner techniques", which involved him getting stoned before filming. Apart from getting stoned before making his videos, he referred to getting stoned using the money he made from his videos - commenting that he "made thousands and bought hella dank .. and bongs shit i smoked so much i think i nearly died ... all thanks to rense!".

Brian Bessent commented that "making money off UFOs requires no talent other than a slightly higher intelligence than that of your intended market".

_____________

Brian Bessent's 2005 (hoaxed) video was supported by various ufologists at the time (including David Sereda - famous for his analysis of NASA "UFO" videos). Given that we have the benefit of a confession of the hoax, it's probably a bit unkind to laugh at some of the pretty pathetic reasons put forward at the time for rejecting the hoax hypothesis.

We now know that Brian Bessent confessed in 2006 that he had hoaxed the video.

He posted a diatribe on his ufotheatre.com website about the gullibility of the UFO community. He explained that he hoaxed UFO videos to make money and that this was very easy to do. He referred, in particular, to his use of the "Bryce" animation software plus "stoner techniques", which involved him getting stoned before filming.

Apart from getting stoned before making his videos, he referred to getting stoned using the money he made from his videos - commenting that he "made thousands and bought hella dank .. and bongs [expletive] i smoked so much i think i nearly died ... all thanks to rense!".

Brian Bessent commented that "making money off UFOs requires no talent other than a slightly higher intelligence than that of your intended market".

Hypotheses

List of versions containing features matching the eyewitness descriptions or material evidence

Mounting

Photo editing began to be used almost immediately after the advent of photography techniques. They were divided into methods of photomontage without manipulation of the image after receiving the photo and retouching of the photo itself or its negative (plate, film, etc.)

Investigation

Versions testing, their confirmation or refutation. Additional information, notes during the study of materials

As it turned out, the author himself admitted that this record is fake.

In fact, in 2006, Brian Bessent admitted to faking the video. On your website ufotheatre.com he posted a diatribe about the credulity of the UFO community. He explained that he was faking UFO videos to make money, and that it was very easy to do. In particular, he mentioned his use of the Bryce animation software and "stoning methods". Brian Bessent observed that "it doesn't take any talent to make money from UFOs, other than a slightly higher intelligence than your intended market."

However, the specified site is currently not working, and the domain is for sale, so it will not be possible to check it 100%. 

Resume

The most likely explanation. The version, confirmed by the investigation

Mounting

Photo editing began to be used almost immediately after the advent of photography techniques. They were divided into methods of photomontage without manipulation of the image after receiving the photo and retouching of the photo itself or its negative (plate, film, etc.)

Similar facts


Log in or register to post comments

Site friends

  • Мир тайн — сайт о таинственном
  • Activite-Paranormale
  • UFOlats
  • Новый Бестиарий
  • The Field Reports
  • UFO Meldpunt Nederland
  • GRUPO DE ESTUDOS DE UFOLOGIA CIENTÍFICA
  • Паранормальная наука, наука об аномалиях
  • Новости уфологии
  • UFO Insights
  • Mundo Ovnis

Attention!

18+

Site contains materials that are not recommended for impressionable people.

You are reporting a typo in the following text:
Simply click the "Send typo report" button to complete the report. You can also include a comment.