| ID | #1477655154 |
| Added | Fri, 28/10/2016 |
| Author | July N. |
| Sources | |
| Phenomena | |
| Status | Investigation
|
Initial data
According to the American, John Koster, he has a proof that the light meets even the ghostly shoes. Many years ago, then a single resident of Midwest city visited the city of Tulsa in Oklahoma and photographed on the memory of the fountain in the square Bartlett square. It happened in the early autumn of 1985. Three decades later the man was considered the all pictures with his wife, and his fiancee suddenly noticed near the fountain of translucent boots.
I was a student, was walking alone in downtown Tulsa, photographed sights. Waited until near the fountain would be empty, and made this image.
Translated by «Yandex.Translator»
Hypotheses
Objects in motion, captured on a long exposure
Most often this artifact is called skayfish if the lens gets a passing bird or insect. It is based on the discrepancy between the speed of the video and the frequency of the flapping of insect wings. Essentially, each video drops a few strokes of the wings of an insect, which when viewed looks like "arrow", provided with long protuberances. The motion of the insect by its translucent body seems to "boom" and vibration of the wings give the appearance of bumps.
Events
Rocket launches (from space.skyrocket.de)
- Site: Xichang Space Center (Songlin), Sichuan (China) Vehicle: CZ-3B/G2 Payload: APStar 9/MySat 1
- Site: Baikonur (Tyuratam, NIIP-5, GIK-5), Tyuratam (USSR / Russia) Vehicle: Proton-M Briz-M (Ph.3) Payload: Türksat 4B
Investigation
The American posted a mysterious image on social news site Reddit, where it sparked heated debate among the regulars of the resource. Many users liked the theory that this effect appeared due to the fact that a person passed near the fountain, at the same time John was photographed with a long exposure.
Some users suggested that the lights at the bottom of the fountain, illuminated boots, acted as a flash lamp, so the shoes and turned on the tape, however the light may fall on the owner of the boots, and that for this reason remains invisible to the camera.
Since for a walking man these boots are located far away from each other, we can assume a deliberate falsification. The boot is clearly on the right was later removed from the filming than the one that left.
Translated by «Yandex.Translator»
Resume
Similar facts
Log in or register to post comments
