| ID | #1627049520 |
| Added | Fri, 23/07/2021 |
| Author | July N. |
| Sources | Знак вопроса 1990 № 2 Александр Кузовкин, Александр Семенов "Неопознанные объекты. Досужие вымыслы или реальность?"
|
| Phenomena | |
| Status | Hypothesis
|
Initial data
The case of getting unexpected results when taking photos. In 1983, two young people went out in the evening on the street of the village of Rozhdestvensky, Leninsky district, to shoot a panorama of the descending twilight. The lights were already on in the village, so the picture promised to be interesting.
And indeed, when after some time the photographers developed the film, they were pretty amazed at the result: the negatives revealed contours resembling the figures of humanoid creatures, as if they were in motion, i.e. taking long steps. Moreover, the image was contoured, and not the background, as usual.
Surprised photographers carefully viewed the frames with the naked eye, and when magnified, and without coming to any conclusion, sent the photos to the editorial office of one respected magazine.
After a while, an answer came from there, in which something incomprehensible was written about the vices of domestic optics and the violation of the photographing regime.
Hypotheses
Multiple exposure or multiple exposure
A special device, which is that the same frame is exposed ("photographed") several times.
Objects in motion, captured on a long exposure
Most often this artifact is called skayfish if the lens gets a passing bird or insect. It is based on the discrepancy between the speed of the video and the frequency of the flapping of insect wings. Essentially, each video drops a few strokes of the wings of an insect, which when viewed looks like "arrow", provided with long protuberances. The motion of the insect by its translucent body seems to "boom" and vibration of the wings give the appearance of bumps.
Investigation
Resume
Similar facts
Log in or register to post comments
